rt4wd is not awd

Is anyone else being drove nuts by everyone call the rt4wd wagons awd? Or am I completely wrong and there is an awd wagon?
«1

Comments

  • VPTVPT Band Wagon
    How is it not awd?
  • TylerStippTylerStipp Wagonist
    All wheel drive is all the time, the rt4wd wagons are front wheel drive untill the front wheels slip
  • HaydzHaydz Moderator
    Yep, drives me nuts too, just like Wagon vs. Wagovan.
  • 503Wagon503Wagon moderator
    i generally refer to it as my 4WD wagon. because i know it is not technically AWD...but thats just me
  • VPTVPT Band Wagon
    TylerStipp wrote:
    All wheel drive is all the time, the rt4wd wagons are front wheel drive untill the front wheels slip


    Thats exactly how AWD works as well.


    4wd is when front and rear wheels are locked 4WD. The RT4wd uses a viscous coupler to drive the rear wheels ALL THE TIME. It IS AWD.
  • 503Wagon503Wagon moderator
    VPT wrote:
    TylerStipp wrote:
    All wheel drive is all the time, the rt4wd wagons are front wheel drive untill the front wheels slip


    Thats exactly how AWD works as well.


    4wd is when front and rear wheels are locked 4WD. The RT4wd uses a viscous coupler to drive the rear wheels ALL THE TIME. It IS AWD.

    thank you captain obvious?
  • VPTVPT Band Wagon
    503Wagon wrote:
    VPT wrote:
    TylerStipp wrote:
    All wheel drive is all the time, the rt4wd wagons are front wheel drive untill the front wheels slip


    Thats exactly how AWD works as well.


    4wd is when front and rear wheels are locked 4WD. The RT4wd uses a viscous coupler to drive the rear wheels ALL THE TIME. It IS AWD.

    thank you captain obvious?



    Obviously because of the question on AWD/4wd it wasn't obvious?
  • bam-bambam-bam Council Member
    actually, since both differentials are open, it's only part-time 2wd. ;p
  • HaydzHaydz Moderator
    AWD = all wheels are driven all the time and you cannot change it
    4WD = all wheels are driven depending on diff choice and range selection (pre-87 wagons)
    RT4WD = all wheels are driven only when the primary drive loses traction (87-onwards)

    Of course that doesn't stop marketers getting it wrong, and there are other variations in there.

    The main part is, the Wagons are NOT AWD.
  • TylerStippTylerStipp Wagonist
    Haydz wrote:
    AWD = all wheels are driven all the time and you cannot change it
    4WD = all wheels are driven depending on diff choice and range selection (pre-87 wagons)
    RT4WD = all wheels are driven only when the primary drive loses traction (87-onwards)

    Of course that doesn't stop marketers getting it wrong, and there are other variations in there.

    The main part is, the Wagons are NOT AWD.


    "like"
  • Haydz wrote:
    AWD = all wheels are driven all the time and you cannot change it
    4WD = all wheels are driven depending on diff choice and range selection (pre-87 wagons)
    RT4WD = all wheels are driven only when the primary drive loses traction (87-onwards)

    Of course that doesn't stop marketers getting it wrong, and there are other variations in there.

    The main part is, the Wagons are NOT AWD.


    Agreed! If it was awd they would have calles it a rtawd not RT4WD.
  • jasnalljasnall Wagonist
    Part time AWD?
  • I was under the impression that it was considered 4wd because you had the option of disengaging the rear differential via the slider on top of the transmission, while awd cars such as eagle talons, sti's, evo's, etc.... You don't have the options of turning it off. Although all of you guys suggestions make perfect sense as well
  • The age old AWD vs 4WD argument. Never have been able to find a definitive answer. Although from what I can tell just from what cars are called AWD and the ones that are called 4WD, the AWD cars all contain some sort of sensing mechanism that allows power to be transferred in the event of a tire slipping. In most cars that are considered 4WD (trucks mostly) The 4 wheel drive is uncaring of a tire that is slipping and just gives both front and rear axles power constantly. Also, I think that honda calls it RT4WD on the wagons because it sounds fancy (read marketing ploy) and that they qualify as AWD due to the fact that they have the sensing characteristic. just my two cents.
  • NZ-DB8RNZ-DB8R Moderator
    Yep this is an old thread.....

    AWD=All wheel Drive, Civic wagons do not have all wheel drive, they are 2wd and the rear kick in when needed hence not AWD
  • Part-time 4wd - YES
    AWD - NO
  • NZ-DB8RNZ-DB8R Moderator
    How is this
    MrWhoopee wrote: »
    Part-time 4wd - YES
    AWD - NO

    Different from this
    NZ-DB8R wrote: »
    Yep this is an old thread.....

    AWD=All wheel Drive, Civic wagons do not have all wheel drive, they are 2wd and the rear kick in when needed hence not AWD

    ???
  • Now I will send this link to my friend that constantly says rt4wd is awd. lol THANK YOU!
  • SiRgeSiRge Wagonist
    If you were to replace the shaft to remove the viscous coupler, what would happen?
  • FakeJDMEF8FakeJDMEF8 Senior Wagonist
    full time 4wd^
  • The point is that Honda did not come out with a Civic Wagon AWD. Yes some of the newer cars have like the same thing and they call it awd but in this case of the Civic Wagon, AWD is irrelevant.
  • The rear tires on the wagon are driven at all times, unless you count the slider on the transmission which is the only good argument I can see against the wagon being AWD. The Viscous coupler may prevent full torque from being applied to the rear tires in normal driving conditions, but save removing a drive line or using the selector on top of the tranny, there is nothing a driver can do to prevent the rear wheels from turning while the tranny is receiving power from the engine. This seems to satisfy the all tires receiving power all the time requirment, even if it's not a 50/50 torque split. Now as far as there actually being a switch that can be used to prevent any power being transferred to the back, even if it isn't available from inside the cab, that could be a point of argument for those saying that it isn't AWD. All that being said, I have still yet to see a definitive distinction between AWD and 4WD from a widely accepted expert or majority agreement. Please link any info you might find on the subject as I would like to know.
  • The rear tires on the wagon are driven at all times, unless you count the slider on the transmission which is the only good argument I can see against the wagon being AWD. The Viscous coupler may prevent full torque from being applied to the rear tires in normal driving conditions, but save removing a drive line or using the selector on top of the tranny, there is nothing a driver can do to prevent the rear wheels from turning while the tranny is receiving power from the engine. This seems to satisfy the all tires receiving power all the time requirment, even if it's not a 50/50 torque split. Now as far as there actually being a switch that can be used to prevent any power being transferred to the back, even if it isn't available from inside the cab, that could be a point of argument for those saying that it isn't AWD. All that being said, I have still yet to see a definitive distinction between AWD and 4WD from a widely accepted expert or majority agreement. Please link any info you might find on the subject as I would like to know.

    http://www.angelfire.com/mech/civciwagon/rt4wd.html

    this is the only thing I've really came across for the whole argument.
  • New to the forum and ran across this post. Confused the heck outta me to be honest, so I did some researching and found a post that was placed on Honda-tech way back in 2003. This may help, but more than likely I am resurrecting another arguement. RT4WD is RT4WD.

    Post from Honda Tech:

    Welp I figured I might as well stop being an assmonkey and might as well show everyone how the real time four wheel drive system works, not to mention, im pulling an all nighter to get my dammn sleep cycle back on track, lemme know what you think. This is all straight from the 89 civic manual. The CRV RT4WD is merely an evolution of this idea, so it uses the same basic principles but is more advanced in how its done.

    General
    When there is no difference in speed between the No.1 and viscous coupling unit (No.2 propeller shaft) , power is transmitted to the front wheels through the front differential and the front driveshafts. The left driveshaft is connected to the differential by an intermediate shaft, The power is also turned 90 degrees by the transfer gears and transmitted to the No.1 propeller shaft. Whenever there is any speed difference between the No.1 propeller shaft and viscous coupling unit (No.2 propeller shaft), power is transmitted to the rear wheels via the viscous coupling unit, the No.2 and No,3 propeller shafts, the rear differential and the rear driveshafts.

    Front Driveshaft
    An intermediate shaft equalizes the length and angle of both driveshafts for easier steering on bumpy roads. The driveshaft end of this shaft runs on a bearing which is held by a holder on the engine case. A constant velocity universal joint at each end of the driveshafts ensures quieter operation and longer life. The front wheels run on an angular bearing for reduced friction

    Propeller Shaft
    The propeller shaft carries power from the transfer to the rear differential. It is of a 2-piece construction and is supported by two rubber mounted bearings. The shaft has four universal joints: one tripod type and three yoke-and-spider type. These joints permit the shaft to lengthen and shorten, as the rear suspension moves.

    Viscous Coupling
    The viscous coupling unit is located on the front end of the No.2 propeller shaft. It consists of a housing that is connected to the No.1 propeller shaft by a tripod joint. Inside the houning are 79 plates, which have 0.2 mm (0.008 in.) of clearance between one another, surrounded by silicon oil. The 40 housing plates are engaged with the splines in the housing and the 39 hub plates are splined to the shaft. The plates have holes in them to aid in heat dissipation. The viscous coupling unit also contains approximately 10 % air to allow for the thermal expansion of the silicon oil.

    Whenever there is any difference in the speed of rotation between the No.1 and No.2 propeller shafts, such as when the front wheels lose traction, there is friction between the housing plates (drive side) and the hub plates (driven side) .This friction is caused by the resistance of the plates sliding against the silicon oil. This resistance between the plates and the silicon oil is what begins to transmit torque from the housing plates to the hub plates and eventually to the rear wheels. This transmission of torque is proportionate to the difference in the speed of rotation of the wheels.

    As the difference in propeller shaft speed continues, the temperature of the silicon oil keeps rising. Due to thermal expansion, the pressure inside the viscous coupling unit is also increasing as the temperature rises.
    When the pressure becomes high enough, the housing plates begin to contact the hub plates and the engine torque to the rear wheels increases rapidly, as noted in the diagram below. To reduce plate wear, there are spacer rings to limit plate to plate contact.
  • AbideAbide Council Member
    Soooo. not to just get in here and start something....but what about an EVO? or Sti with the DCCD locked? Quattro?

    AWD, 4WD, RT4WD, Haldex, SH-AWD, Saab's XWD.

    This is like back when people figure out that a limited slip differential was a good idea but needed to market it.
    so now we have Posi-traction, Torsen, helical, blah blah. all of them are a LSD


    Is it 4wd or awd? yes



    quick edit to say this is my opinion that they are all just marketing nomenclature (dude)
  • NZ-DB8RNZ-DB8R Moderator
    Abide wrote: »
    Soooo. not to just get in here and start something....but what about an EVO? or Sti with the DCCD locked? Quattro?

    Those are AWD, all wheels are driven in normal use. Sure the diffs may apply differing amounts of torque to different wheels depending on conditions but driving along a straight road at a constant speed all wheels are driven.
  • v22v22 Band Wagon
    Are'nt they REALTIME 4WD? Meaning to say 4wd when needed. :)
  • bam-bambam-bam Council Member
    Semantics.
  • AbideAbide Council Member
    NZ-DB8R wrote: »
    Those are AWD, all wheels are driven in normal use. Sure the diffs may apply differing amounts of torque to different wheels depending on conditions but driving along a straight road at a constant speed all wheels are driven.

    So ON that tangent then you would agree that our transfer case is sending no power until the front wheels slip? we know that's not true. The driveshaft spins. It's "Driven" it just happens to not be geared exactly the same. Guess what audi's quattro system had before the Haldex system? viscous coupler.

    anyone not agreeing with those cars being the exact same thing is saying that the difference between RT4WD and AWD is because our "center diff/viscous coupler" is a mechanical piece instead of something controlled by the cars systems. This is no different from a 2.5RS Imprezza which comes with a center diff and two opens.


    bam-bam wrote: »
    Semantics.

    precisely. It's like arguing if the Civic Wagons are a Wagon, a Station Wagon, or an Estate car.
  • NZ-DB8RNZ-DB8R Moderator
    I disagree, it is completly different. Under normal driving conditions RT4WD is 2wd, in some cases all wheels are driven. Yes the drive shaft is spinning but the rear wheels have no torque applied to them.

    AWD (Subaru etc) All wheels have some torque(not necessarily equal amounts) under normal driving conditions, those conditions change and the torque is distributed differently. Having driven my friends V5 STi WRX I can say that at all times there is some torque applied to both the front and rear wheels of the car, this is not true with a RT4WD car like my CR-V.

    So it would be like saying that a Wagon/Estate etc is the same as a 5door liftback. Similar but different enough to be called something else
Sign In or Register to comment.